Entrar
Ainda não disponível neste idiomaEstá a ler a versão inglesa enquanto a tradução é revista.

Method

Three instruments, each with a job and a boundary

Workplace software tends to describe its method as proprietary. Ours is not: these are published instruments with published limitations, which is what makes it possible for someone to disagree with a result on the method rather than on the vendor.

Hero illustration — ourScience

Where each instrument comes from

Named, published and examinable. The limits are the published ones, not ours.

InstrumentOriginatorWhat we use it forDocumented limit
The 7 Workplace Principles (7P)Professor Nick Nunnington, co-founder and advisor to WorkplacedStructuring what a workplace has to support, per activityA framework, not a measurement: it organises the questions rather than answering them
Competing Values FrameworkQuinn and CameronCultural orientation, and the gap between stated and livedSelf-reported and organisation-level; it does not diagnose an individual
Big Five, via TIPICosta and McCrae; TIPI by Gosling, Rentfrow and Swann (2003)Working-condition preferences, returned to the individual in Entry PassThe ten-item form trades precision for completion rate: pattern, never placement

None of the three measures productivity, and we do not claim they do.

What these instruments do not do

None of them measures productivity. Productivity has too many inputs to attribute to a building, and a workplace claim built on it does not survive scrutiny. What is measurable is enablement: how much the workplace helps or hinders the work. It is a narrower claim, and it holds.

None of them measures an individual for the organisation. Personality instruments are used to explain patterns at team level and, in Entry Pass, to give one person guidance about themselves. There is no view in which a manager sees an employee's profile.

The instruments

The 7P model

Developed by Professor Nick Nunnington, co-founder and advisor. It structures a workplace question across seven dimensions so that a conversation about desks does not quietly become a conversation about only desks.

Competing Values Framework

Quinn and Cameron's model of organisational culture, used to see where the workplace supports the culture an organisation has and where it works against it. Its value here is comparative, not diagnostic.

Big Five via TIPI

The Ten-Item Personality Inventory, a short validated measure of the five-factor model. Chosen because it is brief enough that people finish it and validated enough that the result means something. Reported as a pattern, never as a person.

Where the data comes from

The benchmark dataset behind the models has been built since 2001 within RRIS, and its activities moved to Workplaced in 2024. Twenty-five years of occupancy measurement across the Netherlands and Belgium, with the Dutch central government as the largest single client.

That provenance is the reason a benchmark figure on this platform can be questioned in a specific way (you can ask which buildings, which years, which method) rather than being a number with no history.

Argue with the method, not with us

If a result does not match what you see in the building, that is a conversation about instruments and sample. Bring it — it is the conversation we are set up for.