Zaloguj się
Jeszcze niedostępne w tym językuCzytasz wersję angielską, tłumaczenie jest w trakcie weryfikacji.

Accessibility

What this site does, and one thing it knowingly does not

Measured with axe-core against WCAG 2.1 AA on every template, in all eight languages, on every build. This page says what passes, what does not, and why.

The one exception, stated plainly

The brand colours carry text and fail the contrast requirement doing it. White on the brand blue measures 3.8:1 and the teal 2.6:1 against white; WCAG 2.1 AA asks 4.5:1 for body text. Across the site that is roughly 1,100 elements, all one rule, all colour contrast.

Darker twins of both colours were built and then reversed at board level in September 2026, on the grounds that a darker blue reads as a different company. The failure is therefore accepted knowingly rather than missed, and the variables to restore the accessible twins are still in the stylesheet — it is two edits, not a rewrite, if the decision changes.

What does meet the standard

Keyboard operation

Every interactive element is reachable and operable by keyboard, with a visible focus ring that is not the browser default suppressed.

Structure

One main landmark and one h1 per page, headings in order, and lists marked up as lists. Checked on every build across all eight languages.

Text alternatives

Images that carry meaning have alternative text; decorative marks and diagrams are hidden from assistive technology rather than described twice.

Right to left

The Arabic build is a second layout rather than a translation: everything directional uses logical properties, so the interface mirrors instead of leaking.

Motion

Scroll-driven animation is guarded and degrades to its finished state. Nothing moves for a reader who has asked their system for reduced motion.

Text and zoom

Relative units throughout: text reflows at 200% zoom without a horizontal scrollbar, and wide tables scroll inside their own container.

How this is checked

Every build runs axe-core over a representative page of each template in each language and fails on anything that is not the accepted contrast exception. The exception is matched on the colours axe computed rather than on a class list, so a new component landing on the brand ground is counted as accepted and a genuinely new contrast bug is not buried under a thousand of them.

Automated testing finds a minority of accessibility problems. We have not commissioned an independent audit or user testing with assistive technology, and we would rather say so than imply a level of assurance we cannot evidence.

If something here blocks you, tell us

Say which page and what happened. A reply comes from a person within one working day, and if it is a defect rather than the accepted exception it gets fixed rather than logged.