Unlimited scenarios
Two days, three days, team-based, anchor days. Model as many as you like and compare them side by side rather than sequentially.
Hybrid work model
Every hybrid policy trades one thing for another: fewer square metres against a fuller office, flexibility against cohesion, savings against retention. Balance puts numbers on those trade-offs using your own workforce data, so the decision is made before the announcement rather than after the pushback.

Every hybrid scenario tool on the market models against assumptions. Balance models against measurement: Dynamics establishes how this organisation actually works, and Balance runs the policy against that.
The two are sold together for the same reason a calculator is sold with numbers. The People plan is $3.87 per completed employee per month and includes both.
Not “three days because that felt right”, but three days because these are the four things it does and this is what it costs.
Announced policies that get walked back are expensive in trust. Modelling first is cheaper than retreating later.
HR, finance and real estate stop negotiating on instinct.
Two days, three days, team-based, anchor days. Model as many as you like and compare them side by side rather than sequentially.
Office space, satisfaction, emissions, commute burden, recruitment appeal and the workspace impact on productivity, moving together as you change the policy.
The population resolves into anchored, hybrid and remote working patterns, so the policy fits how the organisation actually works instead of the average.
One policy rarely fits a lab, a call centre and a legal department. Balance shows where a single rule breaks.
Desks are sized by the busiest day, not the mean. Balance models the peak, which is where most plans go wrong.
Each scenario carries its square metres and its cost, so finance and HR are looking at the same page.
Illustrative figures for a 1,000-person organisation. Your own numbers come from your own measurement — that is the point of the product.
| Scenario | Desks required at peak | Office m² | Commute CO₂ | Annual cost |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Two days in, org-wide | 520 | 6,200 | Lowest | Lowest |
| Three days in, org-wide | 690 | 8,100 | Higher | Higher |
| Anchor days by team | 560 | 6,700 | Low | Low |
| Free choice, no anchor | 740 | 8,600 | Highest | Highest |
The peak is what sizes the building. Two organisations with the same average attendance and different anchor patterns need different buildings.
Balance models hybrid working policies against your own workforce data. It compares scenarios across six factors: office space, satisfaction, emissions, commute burden, recruitment appeal and cost.
It is a decision aid, not a decision. Leadership still owns the policy, the consultation and the announcement.
We can measure the workplace side of it accurately and the rest by asking. Occupancy describes physical use; Dynamics establishes patterns, preferences and where people work when they are not in the office.
An operating model judged on building data alone is judged on half the picture.
It depends on the product. Dynamics asks them to answer questions once. Occupancy does not involve them, though they should be told it is happening. Entry Pass gives them something back.
Participation should be worth their time, and they should know what is collected, what it is used for and what returns to them.
Balance runs on Dynamics data, which is why the two are sold together: the People plan is $3.87 per completed employee per month and carries both. Bring the policy you are considering and we will show you what it costs on space, commute and retention.