Book a demo

Glossary

Sharing ratio

Quoted as a target when it is an outcome: it follows from the policy and the peak.

The sharing ratio is, in Workplaced's definition, workplaces per FTE: workplaces provided (numerator) divided by FTE assigned (denominator). A ratio of 1 means one FTE has one workplace; 0.7 means 0.7 workplace per FTE. It is an outcome rather than a target: it follows from the peak, the policy and the buffer the organisation accepts.

Also called Desk-sharing ratio, Workplaces per FTE, Flex factor

How it is calculated

Sharing ratio = workplaces provided ÷ FTE assigned (numerator ÷ denominator)

Workplaces provided
Derived from the peak plus a buffer, not chosen in advance.
FTE assigned
The FTE the building serves, on the definition the policy uses.

Expressed as A ratio in workplaces per FTE: 1 means one FTE has one workplace, 0.7 means one FTE has 0.7 workplace, also written 1:1.4 (one workplace for 1.4 FTE). The inverse, 1.4 FTE per workplace, is the same ratio the other way round. State the direction with every figure.

This is a Workplaced definition, not a universal industry norm. Numerator: workplaces provided. Denominator: FTE assigned, on the definition the policy uses. The "occupancy rate" CBRE publishes is assigned employees per available desk: that is the inverse of this ratio, not occupancy. A result of 1.67 FTE per workplace corresponds to a sharing ratio of 0.6.

Illustrative worked example: 600 FTE

Peak attendance at P95
68%
People at the peak
408
Buffer for churn and choice
5%
Workplaces required
429

The sharing ratio is 0.7 workplaces per FTE (1:1.4), roughly seven workplaces for every ten FTE.

Nothing here started from a ratio. Change the policy to three fixed days and the peak moves, and the ratio moves with it.

Where it goes wrong

Setting the ratio first

A ratio chosen before the measurement is a floor-area decision dressed as an analysis. The peak decides it, and the peak is measured rather than assumed.

Applying another organisation's ratio

The same ratio in an organisation with a different attendance policy produces a different experience. It is a result of local conditions, not a benchmark to import.

Forgetting the buffer is a choice

The buffer is where the tolerance for a bad day lives. Setting it to zero is defensible; doing it without saying so is not.

Where this measurement decides something

Related terms

  • Peak

    The measurement the ratio is derived from.

  • Occupancy

    The measure a sharing ratio is most often confused with.

  • No-show rate

    Why the desks provided and the desks used diverge.

Comparing two suppliers' occupancy figures?

Describe in a message how each supplier defines its occupancy figure, and we will tell you what each one is counting.